Flexible OLED displays drive market disruption, manufacturing innovation

October 15, 2017

Consumer electronics manufacturers reside between a rock and a hard place. They must continuously innovate in order to compete in the mass market, yet they're tightly constrained by unrelenting cost pressures. The recent emergence of flexible OLED displays is a prime example of a cutting-edge technology that electronics manufacturers must pursue to maintain market relevance--but producing these displays is expensive, and the number-one reason for this is yield.

Yield--measured in this case by how many manufactured flexible OLED displays are high integrity and therefore usable vs. how many are defective and therefore must be discarded--has to be factored into the end product design at the outset, or the product could be prohibitively expensive to produce at commercial scale.

As such, consumer electronics manufacturers are putting increased pressure on their display suppliers to make bigger investments in yield management. These investments should ultimately improve suppliers' aggregate yield and, in turn, profits. But at the end of the day, it's the suppliers that shoulder the risk of this investment.

This trend is driving increased supplier interest in advanced automated optical inspection (AOI), electrical testing, and automated repair systems that can identify and repair defective manufactured devices with high precision and minimal process friction (see figure), boosting yield rates for flexible OLED displays without compromising the quality or reliability of the end product.

Nascent technology

First-generation flexible OLED display technology already has begun to find its way into the consumer marketplace, but its full potential is far from realized. Samsung Galaxy Edge smartphones and Apple Watches are among the first devices to incorporate this technology, but their curved displays are not designed to be bendable by consumers. Encapsulated in rigid, protective glass, these devices merely hint at what flexible OLED displays are capable of.

Next-generation flexible OLED displays will be foldable, rollable, and perhaps even stretchable, differentiating a new class of electronic devices, and opening a massive market opportunity for consumer electronics providers. According to research firm IHS, flexible displays are expected to make up 15% of total display market revenue in 2024, with revenue from flexible display production expected to expand at a compound annual growth rate of 44% from 2014, reaching $23 billion in 2024.

Mainstream market penetration for user-flexible OLED displays will remain elusive, however, absent the stringent manufacturing process controls required to enable sufficient yield. Here we'll assess some of the core challenges unique to flexible OLED display production--challenges that must be overcome to ensure the cost structures required for commercial viability.

Learning curves

Manufacturers of traditional, rigid LCDs have accumulated 30+ years of experience and expertise in optimizing process efficiencies, continuously refining their process-monitoring and quality-assurance protocols to maximize yield and lower production costs. In time, these glass-based displays have become relatively easy to produce because the glass is durable and flat and acts as a protective barrier for the underlying circuitry and layers.

With flexible OLED displays, the complexity of these processes increases dramatically. These displays still leverage glass, but only as a temporary base layer upon which the flexible polyimide substrate is applied and later removed, creating the foundation for the flexible display circuitry. Intensive process monitoring is required to ensure that the polyimide is properly mixed, is administered at the right temperature, and coats the glass at the right thickness. Despite these stringent controls, the flexible polyimide substrate remains vulnerable to scratches, bubbles, dust, and other contamination.

Protecting against these defects is critical, particularly when they allow the ingress of water vapor and oxygen, which can render the OLED display unusable. Whereas a glass coating acts as a reliable barrier against moisture contamination for a rigid OLED display, seamless, flexible "thin film encapsulation" is required to effectively seal a flexible OLED display--and the encapsulating layers must be durable and yet pliant enough to enable the display to be flexed and folded. This is no easy feat.

With OLED displays, the per-pixel circuitry also is considerably denser than with LCDs. A traditional LCD may house one transistor per pixel. An OLED display, on the other hand, may house between two to seven transistors per pixel, plus one to three capacitors. And the pixels themselves are getting smaller and smaller to enable ever higher resolution displays. As the density of the pixel architecture increases, the precision of the AOI, electrical testing, and automated repair systems included in the manufacturing line also must be increased.

Rising to the challenge

Manufacturers of flexible OLED displays are grappling with a myriad of new variables--materials, design layers, and processes--all of which increase manufacturing complexity and may negatively impact yield at the outset of production. By making sound, calculated investments in advanced AOI, electrical testing, and automated repair systems, however, these manufacturers can ramp up their process efficiencies, improve yield, and drive greater profitability.

The acute challenge of detecting and identifying defects among multiple layers of transparent materials--from the polyimide substrate to the thin-film encapsulation--can be overcome by leveraging submicron-precision and multimodal inspection equipment. With the capability to illuminate materials from different angles and with different light wavelengths (dark field illumination, bright field illumination, etc.), defects can be readily identified anywhere in the layer stack. And whereas conventional AOI systems can require multiple scans to inspect materials under different optical conditions, multimodal systems can acquire all of this data in a single pass, enabling significant time savings.

Similarly high precision systems can be deployed for automated repair processes. Mechanically, the system should be extremely stable, immune to vibration, and afford ultra-accurate laser control that will allow, for example, the capability to cut a short-circuited metal line within a 3-micron gap between two 4x4-micron transistors.

In terms of optical capabilities, an ideal repair system will provide high-magnification review and the flexibility to choose between very different optical wavelengths for the laser. This, in turn, enables the laser to ablate or drill through a single layer in the stack without damaging adjacent layers. With the added capability to automatically define and modify the precise geometric shape of the projected laser beam, sophisticated "patterned" repairs can be applied.

Testing for success

Whereas advanced AOI and automated repair technologies are already well positioned for use today in manufacturing flexible OLED displays, continued innovation still is needed to perfect the requisite array-testing capabilities. Testing technologies, in time, will evolve beyond the flat-panel-display domain to encompass flexible displays, enabling the rigorous quality controls commonly employed today by LCD manufacturers.

Looking ahead, voltage imaging technology holds the promise to overcome the array-testing challenges associated with flexible OLED displays, offering the capability to provide a high-resolution voltage map of the entire display. The pixel voltage data gleaned via this process can enable a test system to determine in real time if a pixel and/or line of pixels is defective.

"Designing for testability" is a key concept that manufacturers of flexible OLED displays are encouraged to embrace at the outset of their pixel design process. By consulting with an experienced array testing technology expert early in the cycle, manufacturers can optimize pixel designs to help ensure more effective and efficient testing processes on the backend.

Investing in the future

Flexible OLED displays will literally transform future generations of smartphones, tablets, wearables, and beyond and will form the foundation for completely new categories of devices. It therefore is incumbent upon display manufacturers to invest appropriately in the advanced AOI, automated repair, and testing technologies needed to optimize yield and profitability across the ecosystem, from the display manufacturers themselves to the consumer electronics providers that depend on them.

By Shulik Leshem and Noam Cohen, Orbotech

Shulik Leshem is the vice president of marketing for Orbotech's Flat Panel Display (FPD) division. Leshem joined Orbotech in October 2014 where he initially served as the division's director of strategic marketing. Previously, he worked at HP Scitex. He has an MBA from Bar llan University and a B.Sc. in electrical engineering from the Technion Institute of Technology.

Noam Cohen is a FPD consultant engaged with Orbotech. He previously served in management at HP Indigo and before that in a variety of management roles at Orbotech. Cohen has an MBA from INSEAD and a B.Sc. in electrical engineering from the Technion Institute of Technology.

COPYRIGHT 2016 NP Communications, LLC

Authors: Shulik Leshem, VP of Marketing, FPD Division, Orbotech & Noam Cohen

Published by: Evaluation Engineering

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this website (including in press releases, webcasts, presentations, posts and other places) are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to, among other things, future prospects, developments and business strategies and involve certain risks and uncertainties. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “will,” “plan,” “expect” and “would” and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions, have been used in this website to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based on management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events as of the date of the applicable information (press releases, webcasts, presentations, or posts) and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to Orbotech’s operations and business environment, the previously announced acquisition of Orbotech by KLA, the manner in which the parties plan to effect the transaction, including the share repurchase program, the ability to raise additional capital necessary to complete the repurchase program within the time frame expected, the expected benefits, synergies and costs of the transaction, management plans relating to the transaction, the expected timing of the completion of the transaction, the parties’ ability to complete the transaction considering the various closing conditions, including conditions related to regulatory and Orbotech shareholder approvals, the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, product development, product extensions, product integration, complementary product offerings and growth opportunities in certain business areas, the potential future financial impact of the transaction, and any assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Actual results may differ materially from those referred to in the forward-looking statements due to a number of important factors, including but not limited to the foregoing matters and the possibility that expected benefits of the transaction may not materialize as expected, that the transaction may not be timely completed, if at all, that KLA-Tencor may not be able to successfully integrate the solutions and employees of the two companies or ensure the continued performance or growth of Orbotech’s products or solutions, the risk that the Company may not achieve its revenue and margin expectations within and for 2018 (including, without limitation, due to shifting move-in dates); cyclicality in the industries in which the Company operates, the Company’s supply chain management and production capacity, order cancelation (often without penalty), timing and occurrence of product acceptance (the Company defines ‘bookings’ and ‘backlog’ as purchase arrangements with customers that are based on mutually agreed terms, which, in some cases for bookings and backlog, may still be subject to completion of written documentation and may be changed or cancelled by the customer, often without penalty), fluctuations in product mix within and among divisions, worldwide economic conditions generally, especially in the industries in which the Company operates, the timing and strength of product and service offerings by the Company and its competitors, changes in business or pricing strategies, changes in the prevailing political and regulatory framework in which the relevant parties operate, including as a result of the United Kingdom’s prospective withdrawal from the European Union (known as “Brexit”) and political uncertainty in the United States, or in economic or technological trends or conditions, including currency fluctuations, inflation and consumer confidence, on a global, regional or national basis, the level of consumer demand for sophisticated devices such as smart mobile devices, automotive electronics, flexible applications and devices, augmented reality/virtual reality and wearable devices, high-performance computing, liquid crystal display and organic light emitting diode screens and other sophisticated devices, the Company’s global operations and its ability to comply with varying legal, regulatory, exchange, tax and customs regimes, the timing and outcome of tax audits, including the best judgment tax assessment issued by the Israel Tax Authority with respect to the audit of tax years 2012-2014 in Israel and the related criminal investigation, the Company’s ability to achieve strategic initiatives, including related to its acquisition strategy, the Company’s debt and corporate financing activities; the timing, final outcome and impact of the criminal matter and ongoing investigation in Korea, including any impact on existing or future business opportunities in Korea and elsewhere, any civil actions related to the Korean matter brought by third parties, including the Company’s customers, which may result in monetary judgments or settlements, expenses associated with the Korean matter, and ongoing or increased hostilities in Israel and the surrounding areas.

The foregoing information should be read in connection with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017, and subsequent SEC filings. This information is also supplemented by the information in the applicable document on this website (e.g., press release, webcast, presentation, posts and other document). The Company is subject to the foregoing and other risks detailed in those reports. The Company assumes no obligation to update the information in this website (including press releases, webcasts, presentations, posts and other places) to reflect new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.