mSAP: The New PCB Manufacturing Imperative for 5G Smartphones

October 23, 2017

Modified semi-additive processes and advanced manufacturing techniques are enabling high-density interconnects in smartphones at lower costs and faster production speeds.

Manufacturers of consumer electronics are under ever-increasing pressure to design the sleek, compact devices that customers covet, balancing form and function in a manner that differentiates their products in a crowded and competitive marketplace. Nowhere is this truer than in the smartphone market, where corporate fortunes can rise and fall on the success of their newest generation of phones.

When it comes to smartphone designs, every millimeter of space savings achieved within the device enclosure can unlock significant value for the end customer. It makes possible the use of larger, higher-resolution displays, bigger batteries, and more sophisticated processors and components. All of this enhances the device’s feature set, and improves the overall user experience.

These form-factor-driven design pressures have been relieved in part via the increased use of high-density interconnects (HDIs), which enable more functions per unit area than conventional printed circuit boards (PCBs). Leveraging finer lines, thinner materials, and laser-drilled vias, HDIs have played a crucial role in the ongoing miniaturization of smartphones and their embedded subsystems.

But as we evolve from 4G LTE to next-generation, 5G-compatible smartphones, the PCB industry’s approach to HDI manufacturing must also evolve. Massive-MIMO (multiple-input multiple-oOutput) antenna configurations and increasingly complex RF front-ends will expand the RF content footprint within the 5G smartphone, and the processing power needed to support the staggering volume of 5G data will likely impact battery capacities and geometries, among many other factors. As a result, despite increased I/O demands, the amount of available space for HDI PCBs within 5G smartphones will be significantly reduced.

Moreover, the higher frequencies inherent to 5G will require much stricter impedance control. If not formed with extreme precision, the thinner traces of HDIs can introduce increased risk of signal degradation and data-integrity lapses.

Addition and Subtraction

PCB manufacturers can overcome these challenges by utilizing a modified semi-additive process (mSAP). Commonly used today in IC substrate production, mSAP is poised for widespread adoption in the advanced HDI PCB manufacturing industry.

Current line/space requirements have already reduced to 30/30 and are expected to decrease even further to 25/25, or even 20/20. mSAP is fully able to support these requirements, enabling 5G smartphone makers to achieve unprecedented device densities while leveraging superior conductor geometries for exacting impedance control at high-frequency operation.

mSAP is essentially the opposite—or reverse image, if you will—of conventional subtractive processes. In a subtractive process, fine lines are formed by coating the copper layer with an etch resist, applying photolithography to image the areas where the copper should be retained, and etching away the un-imaged material.

The main drawback of this approach is that the chemical treatment used to vertically etch the lines will also dissolve the copper in a horizontal direction along the trace walls. In a cross-section view, the resulting traces will appear trapezoidal in shape. This wedged-shaped trace can introduce myriad impedance anomalies, and compromise circuit density in instances where lines are formed wider than intended.

In contrast, with mSAP, a much thinner copper layer is coated onto the laminate, and plated in the areas where the resist isn’t applied—thus, the “additive” nature of the process. The thin copper remaining in the spaces between conductors is then etched away. Whereas trace geometries are chemically defined during subtractive processes, mSAP allows trace geometries to be defined via photolithography. The traces are therefore formed with much greater precision, in straight vertical lines, yielding a rectangular-shaped cross-section that maximizes circuit density and enables accurate impedance control with lower signal loss.

The rectangular shape enabled by the mSAP process is far more effective, maximizing circuit density and accurate impedance control with lower signal loss.

Advanced Manufacturing Techniques

mSAP will help PCB manufacturers overcome the technical hurdles of advanced HDI production for 5G smartphones, but mSAP must ultimately be implemented in a manner that minimizes costs and maximizes production throughput and yield to ensure adequate return on investment. Whereas IC substrate production can comfortably absorb the higher costs typically associated with mSAP, the commercial-volume scale of smartphone PCB manufacturing is far less forgiving where costs and production efficiencies are concerned.

To effectively employ mSAP in mass production, PCB suppliers are increasingly investing in the advanced manufacturing tools and techniques necessary to maintain and extend their competitive advantage through the transition from 4G LTE to 5G smartphones. In this scenario, HDIs with higher densities and precisely formed lines will be a critical requirement.

These PCB manufacturers are adopting advanced direct-imaging (DI) systems capable of achieving 10-micron lines and 15-micron line spacing, with high registration accuracy down to 7.5 microns to ensure precise uniformity. These capabilities can encompass advanced localized-registration features designed to enable the registration of partitions within the individual PCB.

DI systems equipped with high depth of focus (DoF) and multi-wavelength light sources can produce sharper edge patterns across a wide variety of resists, while maintaining high throughput, high quality and consistent uniformity.

Leveraging advanced automated-optical-inspection (AOI) systems, PCB manufacturers can quickly and accurately identify HDI defects for enhanced quality assurance, and reduce the false alarms that may stall production processes. In addition, 2D metrology assessment capabilities can be employed to enable continuous automatic inline measurement of top and bottom conductor widths, ensuring accurate and repeatable measurement using streamlined sampling techniques, and enabling improved impedance control.

Where appropriate, PCB manufacturers may also employ automated-optical-shaping (AOS) systems to eliminate defects such as opens, nicks, and shorts. Using 3D-shaping capabilities that recreate the original design, AOS systems can be applied to inner and outer HDI layers. Whereas manual repair is less accurate and can cause damage to the panel, AOS enables highly precise, high-quality shaping, boosting yield considerably while virtually eliminating PCB scrap, thereby creating a competitive cost structure for the end client.

Ideally, these advanced HDI manufacturing solutions should be tied together via a software framework that collects data throughout the production process, identifying when, where, and how a PCB is handled at every touchpoint. This can help to ensure end-to-end HDI traceability for occasions where QA troubleshooting may be required, while providing a holistic view into manufacturing workflows.

The evolution of 5G smartphones demands a new approach to advanced HDI manufacturing that maximizes the density of onboard embedded electronics while reducing RF signal friction at high frequencies. mSAP is making it possible for PCB suppliers to meet these exacting requirements, while leveraging DI, AOI, and AOS technologies to help lower manufacturing costs, accelerate production throughput, and maximize yield.

Author: Meny Gantz, VP Marketing, PCB division, Orbotech

Published by: Electronic Design

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Except for historical information, the matters discussed in this website (including in press releases, webcasts, presentations, posts and other places) are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to, among other things, future prospects, developments and business strategies and involve certain risks and uncertainties. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “will,” “plan,” “expect” and “would” and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions, have been used in this website to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based on management’s expectations and beliefs concerning future events as of the date of the applicable information (press releases, webcasts, presentations, or posts) and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to Orbotech’s operations and business environment, the previously announced acquisition of Orbotech by KLA, the manner in which the parties plan to effect the transaction, including the share repurchase program, the ability to raise additional capital necessary to complete the repurchase program within the time frame expected, the expected benefits, synergies and costs of the transaction, management plans relating to the transaction, the expected timing of the completion of the transaction, the parties’ ability to complete the transaction considering the various closing conditions, including conditions related to regulatory and Orbotech shareholder approvals, the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, product development, product extensions, product integration, complementary product offerings and growth opportunities in certain business areas, the potential future financial impact of the transaction, and any assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Actual results may differ materially from those referred to in the forward-looking statements due to a number of important factors, including but not limited to the foregoing matters and the possibility that expected benefits of the transaction may not materialize as expected, that the transaction may not be timely completed, if at all, that KLA-Tencor may not be able to successfully integrate the solutions and employees of the two companies or ensure the continued performance or growth of Orbotech’s products or solutions, the risk that the Company may not achieve its revenue and margin expectations within and for 2018 (including, without limitation, due to shifting move-in dates); cyclicality in the industries in which the Company operates, the Company’s supply chain management and production capacity, order cancelation (often without penalty), timing and occurrence of product acceptance (the Company defines ‘bookings’ and ‘backlog’ as purchase arrangements with customers that are based on mutually agreed terms, which, in some cases for bookings and backlog, may still be subject to completion of written documentation and may be changed or cancelled by the customer, often without penalty), fluctuations in product mix within and among divisions, worldwide economic conditions generally, especially in the industries in which the Company operates, the timing and strength of product and service offerings by the Company and its competitors, changes in business or pricing strategies, changes in the prevailing political and regulatory framework in which the relevant parties operate, including as a result of the United Kingdom’s prospective withdrawal from the European Union (known as “Brexit”) and political uncertainty in the United States, or in economic or technological trends or conditions, including currency fluctuations, inflation and consumer confidence, on a global, regional or national basis, the level of consumer demand for sophisticated devices such as smart mobile devices, automotive electronics, flexible applications and devices, augmented reality/virtual reality and wearable devices, high-performance computing, liquid crystal display and organic light emitting diode screens and other sophisticated devices, the Company’s global operations and its ability to comply with varying legal, regulatory, exchange, tax and customs regimes, the timing and outcome of tax audits, including the best judgment tax assessment issued by the Israel Tax Authority with respect to the audit of tax years 2012-2014 in Israel and the related criminal investigation, the Company’s ability to achieve strategic initiatives, including related to its acquisition strategy, the Company’s debt and corporate financing activities; the timing, final outcome and impact of the criminal matter and ongoing investigation in Korea, including any impact on existing or future business opportunities in Korea and elsewhere, any civil actions related to the Korean matter brought by third parties, including the Company’s customers, which may result in monetary judgments or settlements, expenses associated with the Korean matter, and ongoing or increased hostilities in Israel and the surrounding areas.

The foregoing information should be read in connection with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017, and subsequent SEC filings. This information is also supplemented by the information in the applicable document on this website (e.g., press release, webcast, presentation, posts and other document). The Company is subject to the foregoing and other risks detailed in those reports. The Company assumes no obligation to update the information in this website (including press releases, webcasts, presentations, posts and other places) to reflect new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.